DOCUMENT 2 (no overall page limit applied)

4.	Gantt Chart 

Reflecting ESR recruitments, secondments, training events, management and dissemination / public engagement activities 

	Months
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27	28	29	30	31	32	34	35	36	37	38	39	40	41	42	43	44	45	46	47	48	

Researcher Recruitment	ESR 1													S	S	S	S	S	S																														
	ESR 2																																																
	ESR 3									S	S	S												S									S	S	S														
	ESR 4																																																
	ESR 5														S	S	S	S													S	S	S																
	ESR 6																								S	S	S	S	S								S												
	Etc.																																																

Training
	Workshop																																																
	Conference																																																
	Visiting Scientist																				V																	V											
	Other																																																
Mana-gement
																																																	
	Meetings				K									1							2									3										4								E	
Dissem. /
Public engage-ment
	Dissem.																																																
	Public Engagement																																																

S = Secondment
K = Kick-off meeting
E = End of action

5.	Participating Organisations 
All organisations (whether beneficiaries or partner organisations) must complete the appropriate table below. Complete one table of maximum one page per beneficiary and half a page per partner organisation (minimum font size: 9). 

For beneficiaries:

Beneficiary Legal Name:	
General Description	Short description of the activities relevant to the action	
Role and Commitment of key persons (including supervisors)	Including names, title and the intended extent of involvement in the action - in percentage of full-time employment - of the key scientific staff who will be involved in the research, training and supervision	
Key Research Facilities, Infrastructure and Equipment	Outline the key facilities and infrastructure available and demonstrate that each team has sufficient capacity to host and/or offer a suitable environment for supervising the research and training of the recruited Early-Stage Researchers	
Status of Research Premises	Please explain the status of the beneficiary's research facilities – i.e. are they owned by the beneficiary or rented by it? Are its research premises wholly independent from other beneficiaries and/or partner organisations in the consortium?	
Previous Involvement in Research and Training Programmes 	Detail any relevant EU, national or international research and training actions/projects in which the beneficiary has previously participated	
Current Involvement in Research and Training Programmes 	Detail any relevant EU, national or international research and training actions/projects in which the beneficiary is currently participating	
Relevant Publications and/or Research / Innovation Product	Max. 5	

For partner organisations:

Partner Organisation Legal Name: 	
General description		
Key Persons and Expertise		
Key Research Facilities, Infrastructure and Equipment		
Previous and Current Involvement in Research and Training Programmes 		
Relevant Publications and/or Research / Innovation Product	Max. 3	

6. 	Ethics Issues
All research activities in Horizon 2020 must respect fundamental ethics principles, including those reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. These principles include the need to ensure the freedom of research and the need to protect the physical and moral integrity of individuals and the welfare of animals. 

Research ethics is of crucial importance for all scientific domains. Informed consent and confidentiality are as important for a sociological study as they are for clinical research. 

All proposals considered for funding will be submitted to an Ethics Review. The Ethics Review is the core of the H2020 Ethics Appraisal scheme, which concerns all proposals and actions, and also includes the Ethics Checks and Ethics Audit that can be initiated during the action implementation.

In this context, please be aware that it is the applicants’ responsibility to identify any potential ethical issues, to handle the ethical aspects of their proposal, and to detail how they plan to address them.

If any ethics issues have been entered in the ethical issues checklist in Part A of the proposal, then an ethics self-assessment must be included in this section. For more details, please refer to the “H2020 How to complete your Ethics Self-Assessment” guide. 

The self-assessment in this section must:

1) Describe how the proposal meets the national legal and ethics requirements of the country or countries where the tasks raising ethical issues are to be carried out. 

Should the proposal be selected for funding, applicants may be required to provide the following documents upon REA's request, if they are already in their possession:

•	The ethics committee opinion required under national law
•	The document that is mandatory under national law notifying activities raising ethics issues or authorising such activities

If these documents are not in English, applicants must also submit an English summary of them (containing, if available, the conclusions of the committee or authority concerned).

If it is planned to request these documents specifically for the proposed action, the request must contain an explicit reference to its title.

2) Explain in detail in the ethics issues table how the consortium intends to address the issues, in particular as regards:

•	Research objectives (e.g. study of vulnerable populations, dual use, etc.)
•	Research methodology (e.g. clinical trials, involvement of children and related consent procedures, protection of any data collected, etc.) 
•	The potential impact of the research (e.g. dual use issues, environmental damage, stigmatisation of particular social groups, political or financial retaliation, benefit-sharing, malevolent use, etc.).

7.	Letters of Commitment 
	
Please use this section to insert scanned copies of the required Letters of Commitment from partner organisations. These should be on headed paper and signed in order to demonstrate the credibility of the organisation's commitment to the ITN.

For EJD, Letters of Institutional Commitment must also be included from those academic beneficiaries that will award the doctoral degrees. These letters should be signed by an authorised legal representative of the organisation in question so as to offer reasonable assurance regarding the commitment to award the joint, double or multiple doctoral degree(s). There is no specific template for these letters.

 
END PAGE

MARIE Skłodowska-CURIE ACTIONS

Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
Call: H2020-MSCA-ITN-2017

PART B

“PROPOSAL ACRONYM”

This proposal is to be evaluated as:

[ETN]   [EID]   [EJD]
[delete as appropriate]

Part B - Page X of Y